Access to Independence of San Diego, Inc.

What the center reported

166Consumers served72 carried over, 94 new
1,438Information and referral contacts
$399,785Total income
$15,171Part B
$179,469Part C
275Goals achievedof 385 set
23Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
8Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$15,171
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$179,469
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$0
Other federal funds	$0
State government funds	$193,925
Local government funds	$0
Private and other	$11,219
Total income	$399,785

Eight years of reports

Access to Independence of San Diego, Inc. by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C	Moved out of institutions
2016	238	$155,964	$0	$129,764	11
2017	195	$163,111	$0	$141,011	6
2018	191	$220,537	$6,598	$158,798	10
2019	194	$163,567	$0	$163,567	8
2020	139	$334,961	$48,325	$163,567	11
2021	205	$326,830	$39,359	$163,276	8
2022	140	$348,561	$14,284	$165,206	0
2023	166	$399,785	$15,171	$179,469	23

Consumers served, by year

2016238
2017195
2018191
2019194
2020139
2021205
2022140
2023166

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 1 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$2,408	58th	36th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$1,454	85th	70th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	71.4%	77th	72th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	78.8%	67th	65th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	13.86	94th	89th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	12.82	84th	85th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	90.2%	26th	27th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	86.0%	77th	66th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 6 of 7 members.
Staff with disabilities	93.0%	77th	48th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 4.0 of 4.3 FTE.
Equity index	16.4	69th	72th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	35.0%	20th	20th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	0	54th	53th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 48.7% of income; Part B varied by 113.1% (coefficient of variation) across the years reported.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (1,438) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
IL skills training	152	134	88.2%
Peer counseling	128	122	95.3%
Counseling and related services	116	111	95.7%
Advocacy and legal services	72	63	87.5%
Youth transition	66	63	95.5%
Transportation	40	40	100.0%
Other services	40	33	82.5%
Housing and home modifications	25	24	96.0%
Personal assistance	21	12	57.1%
Vocational services	16	12	75.0%
Assistive technology	11	8	72.7%
Recreational services	11	7	63.6%
Communication services	4	4	100.0%
Family services	1	1	100.0%
Preventive services	1	1	100.0%
All services	704	635	90.2%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Personal assistance: 12 of 21 requests filled (57.1%).
Recreational services: 7 of 11 requests filled (63.6%).
Assistive technology: 8 of 11 requests filled (72.7%).
Vocational services: 12 of 16 requests filled (75.0%).
Other services: 33 of 40 requests filled (82.5%).
Advocacy and legal services: 63 of 72 requests filled (87.5%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	132	123	7
Communication	11	11	0
Mobility and transportation	51	11	39
Community-based living	42	24	14
Educational	17	13	4
Vocational	13	10	3
Self-care	10	6	3
Information access and technology	16	14	2
Personal resource management	10	8	2
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	34	23	9
Community and social participation	29	22	5
Other	20	10	10

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	1
5 to 19	29
20 to 24	36
25 to 59	43
60 and older	57
Age unavailable	0

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	28
Mental or emotional	72
Physical	55
Hearing	2
Vision	6
Multiple disabilities	3
Other	0

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with California residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 9 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	61	38.9%	42.3%	0.92
Black or African American	11	7.0%	6.4%	1.10
American Indian or Alaska Native	4	2.5%	1.2%	2.12
Asian	13	8.3%	10.2%	0.81
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	0	0.0%	0.4%	0.00
Two or more races	2	1.3%	11.9%	0.11
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	66	42.0%	27.6%	1.52

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

None of the arithmetic checks failed for this report. That means the tables add up, not that the counts are verified.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.