Resources for Independence Central Valley

What the center reported

182Consumers served98 carried over, 84 new
7,981Information and referral contacts
$643,721Total income
$0Part B
$79,141Part C
20Goals achievedof 246 set
0Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
8Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$0
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$79,141
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$0
Other federal funds	$16,055
State government funds	$474,262
Local government funds	$0
Private and other	$74,262
Total income	$643,721

Eight years of reports

Resources for Independence Central Valley by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C
2016	67	$119,546	$0	$56,046
2017	22	$62,181	$0	$62,181
2018	29	$70,025	$0	$70,025
2019	226	$1,111,700	$0	$72,128
2020	48	$1,377,335	$0	$72,128
2021	54	$1,397,520	$0	$72,000
2022	124	$394,116	$0	$72,851
2023	182	$643,721	$0	$79,141

Consumers served, by year

201667
201722
201829
2019226
202048
202154
2022124
2023182

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 2 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$3,537	45th	36th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$32,186	10th	5th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	8.1%	6th	6th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	26.1%	19th	15th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	0.00	11th	10th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	0.00	11th	10th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	100.0%	76th	76th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	80.0%	67th	69th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 4 of 5 members.
Staff with disabilities	71.0%	38th	32th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 12.0 of 17.0 FTE.
Equity index	17.5	64th	70th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	83.4%	3th	2th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	0	54th	53th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 12.3% of income.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (7,981) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
Advocacy and legal services	128	128	100.0%
IL skills training	87	87	100.0%
Assistive technology	53	53	100.0%
Communication services	37	37	100.0%
Housing and home modifications	31	31	100.0%
Preventive services	18	18	100.0%
Youth transition	15	15	100.0%
Transportation	14	14	100.0%
Vocational services	12	12	100.0%
Peer counseling	10	10	100.0%
Counseling and related services	9	9	100.0%
Personal assistance	6	6	100.0%
Mobility training	3	3	100.0%
Recreational services	3	3	100.0%
Physical restoration	1	1	100.0%
Rehabilitation technology	1	1	100.0%
Therapeutic treatment	1	1	100.0%
All services	429	429	100.0%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Advocacy and legal services: 128 of 128 requests filled (100.0%).
Assistive technology: 53 of 53 requests filled (100.0%).
Communication services: 37 of 37 requests filled (100.0%).
Housing and home modifications: 31 of 31 requests filled (100.0%).
IL skills training: 87 of 87 requests filled (100.0%).
Peer counseling: 10 of 10 requests filled (100.0%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	21	0	17
Communication	7	0	6
Mobility and transportation	22	1	17
Community-based living	48	1	42
Educational	7	0	7
Vocational	27	1	21
Self-care	18	1	12
Information access and technology	26	10	16
Personal resource management	36	3	32
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	2	0	2
Community and social participation	10	1	8
Other	22	2	16

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	9
5 to 19	17
20 to 24	14
25 to 59	86
60 and older	56
Age unavailable	0

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	31
Mental or emotional	31
Physical	75
Hearing	1
Vision	4
Multiple disabilities	27
Other	13

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with California residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 33 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	61	40.9%	42.3%	0.97
Black or African American	16	10.7%	6.4%	1.69
American Indian or Alaska Native	6	4.0%	1.2%	3.35
Asian	3	2.0%	10.2%	0.20
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	2	1.3%	0.4%	3.77
Two or more races	6	4.0%	11.9%	0.34
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	55	36.9%	27.6%	1.34

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

None of the arithmetic checks failed for this report. That means the tables add up, not that the counts are verified.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.