Independent Living Resources of Solano & Contra Costa Counties

What the center reported

1,001Consumers served84 carried over, 917 new
2,766Information and referral contacts
$1,358,259Total income
$0Part B
$201,733Part C
927Goals achievedof 1,030 set
17Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
8Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$0
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$201,733
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$0
Other federal funds	$132,921
State government funds	$723,829
Local government funds	$268,605
Private and other	$31,171
Total income	$1,358,259

Eight years of reports

Independent Living Resources of Solano & Contra Costa Counties by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C	Moved out of institutions
2016	27	$665,185	$0	$158,449	0
2017	82	$196,772	$0	$158,503	0
2018	144	$266,785	$0	$178,497	2
2019	151	$245,608	$0	$183,858	0
2020	171	$241,058	$0	$183,858	4
2021	244	$236,831	$0	$183,531	8
2022	973	$411,461	$0	$185,700	7
2023	1,001	$1,358,259	$0	$201,733	17

Consumers served, by year

201627
201782
2018144
2019151
2020171
2021244
2022973
20231,001

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 3 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$1,357	85th	88th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$1,465	85th	83th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	90.0%	94th	88th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	99.8%	98th	97th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	1.70	66th	72th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	8.43	80th	78th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	92.5%	31th	24th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	100.0%	93th	93th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 6 of 6 members.
Staff with disabilities	52.0%	6th	6th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 11.0 of 21.3 FTE.
Equity index	55.5	7th	4th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	81.9%	3th	1th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	0	54th	56th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 14.9% of income.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (2,766) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
Assistive technology	716	714	99.7%
Other services	164	161	98.2%
Mobility training	59	2	3.4%
IL skills training	27	18	66.7%
Housing and home modifications	13	13	100.0%
Personal assistance	13	11	84.6%
Transportation	13	7	53.8%
Advocacy and legal services	10	10	100.0%
Youth transition	10	10	100.0%
Peer counseling	9	9	100.0%
Counseling and related services	5	5	100.0%
Children's services	3	3	100.0%
Communication services	3	3	100.0%
Vocational services	2	2	100.0%
Family services	1	1	100.0%
Preventive services	1	1	100.0%
Recreational services	1	1	100.0%
All services	1,050	971	92.5%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Mobility training: 2 of 59 requests filled (3.4%).
Transportation: 7 of 13 requests filled (53.8%).
IL skills training: 18 of 27 requests filled (66.7%).
Personal assistance: 11 of 13 requests filled (84.6%).
Other services: 161 of 164 requests filled (98.2%).
Assistive technology: 714 of 716 requests filled (99.7%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	4	3	1
Mobility and transportation	71	7	64
Community-based living	193	171	22
Vocational	5	2	3
Self-care	4	1	3
Information access and technology	714	711	3
Personal resource management	3	3	0
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	18	17	1
Community and social participation	2	1	0
Other	16	11	5

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	0
5 to 19	1
20 to 24	9
25 to 59	49
60 and older	941
Age unavailable	1

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	45
Mental or emotional	23
Physical	450
Hearing	13
Vision	11
Multiple disabilities	35
Other	424

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with California residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 67 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	188	20.1%	42.3%	0.48
Black or African American	314	33.6%	6.4%	5.29
American Indian or Alaska Native	0	0.0%	1.2%	0.00
Asian	353	37.8%	10.2%	3.71
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	9	1.0%	0.4%	2.71
Two or more races	8	0.9%	11.9%	0.07
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	62	6.6%	27.6%	0.24

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

None of the arithmetic checks failed for this report. That means the tables add up, not that the counts are verified.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.