Disability Action Center

What the center reported

1,196Consumers served834 carried over, 362 new
4,879Information and referral contacts
$825,656Total income
$0Part B
$196,411Part C
906Goals achievedof 1,707 set
1Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
8Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$0
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$196,411
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$0
Other federal funds	$0
State government funds	$379,597
Local government funds	$0
Private and other	$249,648
Total income	$825,656

Eight years of reports

Disability Action Center by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C	Moved out of institutions
2016	475	$548,685	$145,260	$154,545	0
2017	285	$534,733	$199,202	$154,321	0
2018	312	$427,796	$6,532	$173,787	9
2019	611	$756,543	$0	$179,007	1
2020	872	$741,125	$0	$179,007	0
2021	1,031	$741,020	$27,373	$178,689	0
2022	1,352	$754,990	$0	$180,801	1
2023	1,196	$825,656	$0	$196,411	1

Consumers served, by year

2016475
2017285
2018312
2019611
2020872
20211,031
20221,352
20231,196

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 2 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$690	97th	96th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$911	92th	96th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	53.1%	53th	60th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	98.8%	97th	98th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	0.08	22th	20th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	0.51	33th	32th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	100.0%	76th	76th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	0.0%	1th	2th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 0 of 0 members.
Staff with disabilities	0.0%	1th	3th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 0.0 of 0.0 FTE.
Equity index	64.8	3th	2th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	19.9%	50th	43th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	0	54th	53th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 23.8% of income; Part B varied by 156.2% (coefficient of variation) across the years reported.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (4,879) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
Housing and home modifications	658	658	100.0%
Mobility training	526	526	100.0%
Assistive technology	450	450	100.0%
Advocacy and legal services	378	378	100.0%
IL skills training	305	305	100.0%
Communication services	48	48	100.0%
Personal assistance	38	38	100.0%
Preventive services	38	38	100.0%
Peer counseling	16	16	100.0%
Transportation	15	15	100.0%
Youth transition	13	13	100.0%
Mental restoration	8	8	100.0%
Vocational services	8	8	100.0%
Recreational services	4	4	100.0%
Other services	2	2	100.0%
All services	2,507	2,507	100.0%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Advocacy and legal services: 378 of 378 requests filled (100.0%).
Assistive technology: 450 of 450 requests filled (100.0%).
Communication services: 48 of 48 requests filled (100.0%).
Housing and home modifications: 658 of 658 requests filled (100.0%).
IL skills training: 305 of 305 requests filled (100.0%).
Mobility training: 526 of 526 requests filled (100.0%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	276	125	149
Communication	65	21	42
Mobility and transportation	406	154	249
Community-based living	336	336	118
Educational	5	2	2
Vocational	4	1	3
Self-care	412	141	268
Information access and technology	67	47	17
Personal resource management	81	66	15
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	1	1	1
Community and social participation	46	12	33
Other	8	0	8

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	4
5 to 19	31
20 to 24	12
25 to 59	266
60 and older	883
Age unavailable	0

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	82
Mental or emotional	21
Physical	796
Hearing	7
Vision	89
Multiple disabilities	197
Other	4

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with California residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 1 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	6	0.5%	42.3%	0.01
Black or African American	33	2.8%	6.4%	0.43
American Indian or Alaska Native	29	2.4%	1.2%	2.02
Asian	14	1.2%	10.2%	0.12
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	43	3.6%	0.4%	10.11
Two or more races	19	1.6%	11.9%	0.13
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	1,051	87.9%	27.6%	3.18

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

None of the arithmetic checks failed for this report. That means the tables add up, not that the counts are verified.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.