Access to Independence of San Diego, Inc.

What the center reported

279Consumers served95 carried over, 184 new
1,792Information and referral contacts
$566,024Total income
$16,117Part B
$181,447Part C
919Goals achievedof 1,159 set
41Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
8Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$16,117
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$181,447
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$0
Other federal funds	$0
State government funds	$362,820
Local government funds	$0
Private and other	$5,640
Total income	$566,024

Eight years of reports

Access to Independence of San Diego, Inc. by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C	Moved out of institutions
2016	197	$186,236	$0	$116,120	0
2017	216	$288,177	$0	$142,565	3
2018	254	$371,761	$836	$160,548	2
2019	238	$213,040	$0	$165,370	3
2020	230	$317,183	$0	$165,370	0
2021	286	$373,925	$4,500	$165,076	2
2022	194	$438,498	$4,845	$167,027	0
2023	279	$566,024	$16,117	$181,447	41

Consumers served, by year

2016197
2017216
2018254
2019238
2020230
2021286
2022194
2023279

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 1 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$2,029	68th	45th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$616	96th	90th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	79.3%	86th	82th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	77.5%	65th	60th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	14.70	94th	92th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	22.60	92th	94th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	93.1%	32th	34th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	86.0%	77th	66th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 6 of 7 members.
Staff with disabilities	52.0%	6th	2th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 2.4 of 4.6 FTE.
Equity index	63.7	3th	9th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	33.4%	22th	21th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	0	54th	53th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 34.9% of income; Part B varied by 158.7% (coefficient of variation) across the years reported.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (1,792) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
Peer counseling	200	200	100.0%
IL skills training	165	132	80.0%
Other services	113	90	79.6%
Youth transition	112	111	99.1%
Communication services	104	104	100.0%
Assistive technology	84	84	100.0%
Transportation	77	75	97.4%
Advocacy and legal services	76	76	100.0%
Preventive services	24	24	100.0%
Housing and home modifications	22	14	63.6%
Vocational services	20	19	95.0%
Personal assistance	1	0	0.0%
All services	998	929	93.1%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Housing and home modifications: 14 of 22 requests filled (63.6%).
Other services: 90 of 113 requests filled (79.6%).
IL skills training: 132 of 165 requests filled (80.0%).
Vocational services: 19 of 20 requests filled (95.0%).
Transportation: 75 of 77 requests filled (97.4%).
Youth transition: 111 of 112 requests filled (99.1%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	187	117	70
Communication	81	51	30
Mobility and transportation	112	87	24
Community-based living	137	120	13
Educational	40	40	0
Vocational	55	51	4
Self-care	44	43	1
Information access and technology	106	66	40
Personal resource management	105	100	4
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	60	41	12
Community and social participation	101	100	0
Other	131	103	27

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	0
5 to 19	30
20 to 24	26
25 to 59	87
60 and older	136
Age unavailable	0

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	37
Mental or emotional	29
Physical	31
Hearing	0
Vision	9
Multiple disabilities	161
Other	12

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with California residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 1 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	16	5.8%	42.3%	0.14
Black or African American	6	2.2%	6.4%	0.34
American Indian or Alaska Native	0	0.0%	1.2%	0.00
Asian	1	0.4%	10.2%	0.04
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	0	0.0%	0.4%	0.00
Two or more races	1	0.4%	11.9%	0.03
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	254	91.4%	27.6%	3.31

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

None of the arithmetic checks failed for this report. That means the tables add up, not that the counts are verified.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.