Independent Living Center, Inc.

What the center reported

852Consumers served572 carried over, 280 new
852Information and referral contacts
$2,628,282Total income
$91,351Part B
$79,319Part C
310Goals achievedof 1,079 set
4Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
8Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$91,351
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$79,319
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$62,498
Other federal funds	$224,111
State government funds	$894,140
Local government funds	$0
Private and other	$1,276,863
Total income	$2,628,282

Eight years of reports

Independent Living Center, Inc. by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C	Moved out of institutions
2016	959	$1,028,768	$68,213	$60,830	8
2017	799	$1,129,800	$68,214	$60,830	1
2018	799	$1,247,710	$85,114	$68,598	2
2019	706	$1,304,190	$79,807	$70,540	2
2020	658	$1,679,238	$78,131	$70,540	0
2021	737	$1,404,677	$84,392	$70,540	1
2022	757	$1,773,124	$97,885	$72,094	3
2023	852	$2,628,282	$91,351	$79,319	4

Consumers served, by year

2016959
2017799
2018799
2019706
2020658
2021737
2022757
2023852

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 4 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$3,085	50th	82th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$8,478	37th	62th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	28.7%	25th	25th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	57.7%	43th	51th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	0.47	37th	42th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	5.04	71th	60th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	100.0%	76th	78th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	75.0%	57th	69th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 3 of 4 members.
Staff with disabilities	82.0%	59th	79th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 14.1 of 17.1 FTE.
Equity index	20.5	54th	51th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	31.5%	26th	34th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	0	54th	54th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 8.9% of income; Part B varied by 11.9% (coefficient of variation) across the years reported.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (852) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
Transportation	463	463	100.0%
Advocacy and legal services	449	449	100.0%
IL skills training	421	421	100.0%
Assistive technology	174	174	100.0%
Recreational services	129	129	100.0%
Housing and home modifications	104	104	100.0%
Vocational services	72	72	100.0%
Other services	60	60	100.0%
Youth transition	46	46	100.0%
Mobility training	14	14	100.0%
Peer counseling	14	14	100.0%
Family services	13	13	100.0%
Children's services	4	4	100.0%
All services	1,963	1,963	100.0%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Advocacy and legal services: 449 of 449 requests filled (100.0%).
Assistive technology: 174 of 174 requests filled (100.0%).
Family services: 13 of 13 requests filled (100.0%).
Housing and home modifications: 104 of 104 requests filled (100.0%).
IL skills training: 421 of 421 requests filled (100.0%).
Mobility training: 14 of 14 requests filled (100.0%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	47	5	32
Mobility and transportation	438	96	305
Community-based living	164	48	90
Educational	2	1	1
Vocational	20	1	16
Self-care	39	10	19
Information access and technology	90	38	45
Personal resource management	211	104	81
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	4	4	0
Community and social participation	64	3	57

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	4
5 to 19	41
20 to 24	25
25 to 59	312
60 and older	470
Age unavailable	0

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	267
Mental or emotional	178
Physical	250
Hearing	12
Vision	77
Multiple disabilities	10
Other	58

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with Alaska residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 0 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	679	79.7%	59.2%	1.35
Black or African American	19	2.2%	2.5%	0.89
American Indian or Alaska Native	97	11.4%	16.3%	0.70
Asian	16	1.9%	4.6%	0.41
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	10	1.2%	1.5%	0.80
Two or more races	17	2.0%	10.2%	0.20
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	14	1.6%	5.7%	0.29

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

None of the arithmetic checks failed for this report. That means the tables add up, not that the counts are verified.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.