ALPHA ONE

What the center reported

3,281Consumers served2,426 carried over, 855 new
1,601Information and referral contacts
$42,961,015Total income
$363,330Part B
$1,094,997Part C
1,721Goals achievedof 2,632 set
11Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
8Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$363,330
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$1,094,997
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$0
Other federal funds	$27,204,933
State government funds	$14,014,466
Local government funds	$0
Private and other	$283,288
Total income	$42,961,015

Eight years of reports

ALPHA ONE by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C	Moved out of institutions
2016	264	$12,623,212	$363,188	$839,761	5
2017	443	$14,463,213	$257,138	$839,761	4
2018	640	$14,860,079	$283,985	$947,004	3
2019	1,382	$19,635,834	$227,679	$973,813	0
2020	2,078	$21,961,362	$561,219	$973,814	12
2021	2,320	$23,563,356	$831,183	$973,814	3
2022	2,995	$32,528,287	$520,771	$995,262	4
2023	3,281	$42,961,015	$363,330	$1,094,997	11

Consumers served, by year

2016264
2017443
2018640
20191,382
20202,078
20212,320
20222,995
20233,281

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 4 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$13,094	9th	29th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$24,963	13th	24th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	65.4%	69th	70th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	30.7%	23th	25th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	0.34	33th	36th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	1.00	44th	36th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	87.7%	22th	27th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	80.0%	67th	80th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 4 of 5 members.
Staff with disabilities	62.0%	23th	42th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 39.0 of 63.0 FTE.
Equity index	5.8	96th	94th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	42.4%	12th	16th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	1	5th	5th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 3.4% of income; Part B varied by 44.5% (coefficient of variation) across the years reported.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (1,601) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
Personal assistance	463	438	94.6%
Housing and home modifications	322	259	80.4%
Other services	275	260	94.5%
Advocacy and legal services	204	212	103.9%
Assistive technology	196	139	70.9%
Transportation	43	35	81.4%
Youth transition	41	23	56.1%
IL skills training	24	20	83.3%
Mental restoration	19	18	94.7%
Recreational services	14	13	92.9%
Mobility training	12	3	25.0%
Vocational services	11	8	72.7%
Rehabilitation technology	8	7	87.5%
Therapeutic treatment	8	7	87.5%
Peer counseling	7	5	71.4%
Prostheses and orthotics	6	5	83.3%
Communication services	4	5	125.0%
Physical restoration	4	2	50.0%
Counseling and related services	3	1	33.3%
Preventive services	2	1	50.0%
All services	1,666	1,461	87.7%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Mobility training: 3 of 12 requests filled (25.0%).
Youth transition: 23 of 41 requests filled (56.1%).
Assistive technology: 139 of 196 requests filled (70.9%).
Vocational services: 8 of 11 requests filled (72.7%).
Housing and home modifications: 259 of 322 requests filled (80.4%).
Transportation: 35 of 43 requests filled (81.4%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	537	373	325
Communication	13	3	12
Mobility and transportation	133	79	97
Community-based living	819	499	520
Educational	22	3	20
Vocational	17	6	15
Self-care	813	649	476
Information access and technology	100	37	96
Personal resource management	45	20	37
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	27	11	25
Community and social participation	42	13	34
Other	64	28	52

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	0
5 to 19	25
20 to 24	83
25 to 59	1,138
60 and older	2,035
Age unavailable	0

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	12
Mental or emotional	67
Physical	701
Hearing	2
Vision	3
Multiple disabilities	2,482
Other	14

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with Maine residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 79 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	3,012	94.1%	91.1%	1.03
Black or African American	94	2.9%	1.2%	2.45
American Indian or Alaska Native	49	1.5%	0.7%	2.26
Asian	34	1.1%	0.8%	1.27
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	1	0.0%	0.0%	1.10
Two or more races	3	0.1%	4.5%	0.02
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	9	0.3%	1.7%	0.17

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

More received a service than requested it. For at least one service type, the count receiving exceeds the count requesting.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.