Southern Nevada Center for Independent Living

What the center reported

503Consumers served381 carried over, 122 new
946Information and referral contacts
$424,652Total income
$0Part B
$303,359Part C
56Goals achievedof 645 set
0Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
8Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$0
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$303,359
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$0
Other federal funds	$119,737
State government funds	$582
Local government funds	$0
Private and other	$974
Total income	$424,652

Eight years of reports

Southern Nevada Center for Independent Living by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C	Moved out of institutions
2016	579	$320,426	$0	$232,648	0
2017	408	$308,754	$0	$233,765	0
2018	481	$350,373	$0	$262,358	1
2019	511	$338,053	$0	$268,945	2
2020	575	$353,072	$0	$269,786	5
2021	568	$393,423	$0	$269,786	1
2022	602	$405,889	$0	$268,724	0
2023	503	$424,652	$0	$303,359	0

Consumers served, by year

2016579
2017408
2018481
2019511
2020575
2021568
2022602
2023503

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 1 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$844	93th	82th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$7,583	40th	23th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	8.7%	6th	5th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	33.8%	26th	25th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	0.00	11th	14th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	0.00	11th	14th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	99.8%	52th	52th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	60.0%	20th	13th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 3 of 5 members.
Staff with disabilities	78.0%	50th	20th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 3.2 of 4.1 FTE.
Equity index	32.9	28th	32th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	10.8%	87th	85th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	0	54th	53th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 71.4% of income.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (946) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
Advocacy and legal services	122	122	100.0%
IL skills training	122	122	100.0%
Peer counseling	122	122	100.0%
Housing and home modifications	78	78	100.0%
Children's services	56	56	100.0%
Youth transition	52	52	100.0%
Transportation	21	21	100.0%
Preventive services	9	9	100.0%
Assistive technology	4	4	100.0%
Personal assistance	3	3	100.0%
Other services	3	3	100.0%
Vocational services	2	1	50.0%
Communication services	1	1	100.0%
Family services	1	1	100.0%
All services	596	595	99.8%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Advocacy and legal services: 122 of 122 requests filled (100.0%).
Children's services: 56 of 56 requests filled (100.0%).
Housing and home modifications: 78 of 78 requests filled (100.0%).
IL skills training: 122 of 122 requests filled (100.0%).
Peer counseling: 122 of 122 requests filled (100.0%).
Transportation: 21 of 21 requests filled (100.0%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	103	13	92
Communication	5	1	4
Mobility and transportation	45	12	33
Community-based living	381	8	373
Educational	20	12	8
Vocational	13	0	13
Self-care	38	4	34
Information access and technology	6	0	6
Personal resource management	29	4	25
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	3	0	3
Community and social participation	2	2	0

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	2
5 to 19	19
20 to 24	33
25 to 59	284
60 and older	165
Age unavailable	0

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	78
Mental or emotional	106
Physical	277
Hearing	6
Vision	27
Multiple disabilities	9
Other	0

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with Nevada residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 6 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	152	30.6%	54.5%	0.56
Black or African American	193	38.8%	8.7%	4.49
American Indian or Alaska Native	16	3.2%	1.2%	2.60
Asian	16	3.2%	6.1%	0.52
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	7	1.4%	0.7%	2.14
Two or more races	33	6.6%	10.4%	0.64
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	80	16.1%	18.4%	0.88

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

None of the arithmetic checks failed for this report. That means the tables add up, not that the counts are verified.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.