Roads To Independence

What the center reported

3,244Consumers served1,336 carried over, 1,908 new
10,491Information and referral contacts
$1,963,022Total income
$31,199Part B
$22,863Part C
2,802Goals achievedof 5,677 set
13Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
8Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$31,199
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$22,863
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$0
Other federal funds	$452,050
State government funds	$888,416
Local government funds	$0
Private and other	$568,493
Total income	$1,963,022

Eight years of reports

Roads To Independence by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C	Moved out of institutions
2016	2,369	$952,966	$20,102	$17,534	19
2017	2,616	$877,634	$22,000	$17,534	23
2018	2,213	$1,180,749	$26,648	$19,773	13
2019	2,524	$1,388,029	$27,758	$20,333	13
2020	2,825	$1,435,200	$26,248	$20,333	16
2021	2,702	$1,324,260	$27,759	$20,333	6
2022	3,249	$1,621,745	$27,759	$20,781	16
2023	3,244	$1,963,022	$31,199	$22,863	13

Consumers served, by year

20162,369
20172,616
20182,213
20192,524
20202,825
20212,702
20223,249
20233,244

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 3 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$605	98th	99th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$701	94th	93th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	49.4%	48th	45th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	90.4%	84th	81th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	0.40	35th	38th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	56.86	97th	96th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	100.0%	76th	74th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	63.0%	27th	32th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 5 of 8 members.
Staff with disabilities	87.0%	70th	83th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 22.5 of 25.8 FTE.
Equity index	7.1	95th	92th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	24.5%	37th	37th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	0	54th	56th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 2.8% of income; Part B varied by 12.6% (coefficient of variation) across the years reported.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (10,491) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
Assistive technology	2,336	2,336	100.0%
Advocacy and legal services	602	602	100.0%
Communication services	419	419	100.0%
Transportation	349	349	100.0%
Personal assistance	304	304	100.0%
Housing and home modifications	293	293	100.0%
IL skills training	260	260	100.0%
Vocational services	249	249	100.0%
Peer counseling	245	245	100.0%
Recreational services	210	210	100.0%
Physical restoration	150	150	100.0%
Youth transition	141	141	100.0%
Preventive services	130	130	100.0%
Mental restoration	80	80	100.0%
Counseling and related services	59	59	100.0%
Family services	52	52	100.0%
Mobility training	38	38	100.0%
Children's services	15	15	100.0%
Rehabilitation technology	5	5	100.0%
Prostheses and orthotics	4	4	100.0%
Therapeutic treatment	3	3	100.0%
All services	5,944	5,944	100.0%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Advocacy and legal services: 602 of 602 requests filled (100.0%).
Assistive technology: 2,336 of 2,336 requests filled (100.0%).
Children's services: 15 of 15 requests filled (100.0%).
Communication services: 419 of 419 requests filled (100.0%).
Counseling and related services: 59 of 59 requests filled (100.0%).
Family services: 52 of 52 requests filled (100.0%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	342	88	182
Communication	99	29	52
Mobility and transportation	1,868	1,155	669
Community-based living	341	97	173
Educational	166	42	92
Vocational	232	67	119
Self-care	1,887	1,161	665
Information access and technology	104	16	68
Personal resource management	320	78	186
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	22	13	9
Community and social participation	296	56	192

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	5
5 to 19	146
20 to 24	122
25 to 59	1,181
60 and older	1,790
Age unavailable	0

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	119
Mental or emotional	169
Physical	2,095
Hearing	6
Vision	17
Multiple disabilities	758
Other	80

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with Utah residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 78 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	2,432	76.8%	77.6%	0.99
Black or African American	95	3.0%	0.9%	3.40
American Indian or Alaska Native	49	1.5%	1.5%	1.05
Asian	20	0.6%	1.7%	0.38
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	17	0.5%	0.8%	0.65
Two or more races	46	1.5%	6.5%	0.22
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	507	16.0%	11.1%	1.45

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

None of the arithmetic checks failed for this report. That means the tables add up, not that the counts are verified.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.