What the center reported

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
SourceAmount
Title VII Part B (through the state)$0
Title VII Part C (direct federal)$470,514
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)$0
Other federal funds$768,000
State government funds$51,892,607
Local government funds$219,706
Private and other$8,875,303
Total income$62,226,130

Eight years of reports

ABILITY360, Inc. by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report yearConsumers servedTotal incomePart BPart CMoved out of institutions
20163,568$45,575,794$0$345,7248
20173,665$46,943,409$0$347,7379
20183,727$46,924,940$0$396,4498
20193,518$50,620,233$0$410,3724
20202,401$46,202,745$0$414,4535
20212,172$50,255,166$0$418,8262
20221,833$51,867,312$0$436,38912
20231,895$62,226,130$0$470,51412

Consumers served, by year

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 4 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
MeasureValueNational percentileSize-peer percentileWhat it is
Income per consumer$32,8371th4thTotal income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved$95,2934th8thTotal income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate56.8%57th55thGoals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met38.6%29th32thShare of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers0.6345th50thRelocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C2.5560th51thThe same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate85.2%19th23thConsumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities53.0%4th7thThe regulation requires more than 50%. 8 of 15 members.
Staff with disabilities52.0%6th8thShare of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 53.0 of 101.0 FTE.
Equity index37.520th15thIndex of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility10.1%88th92thCoefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags15th5thFailed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 0.8% of income.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (8,668) and is not in this table.
ServiceRequestedReceivedFill rate
IL skills training453542119.6%
Recreational services40237693.5%
Advocacy and legal services38325265.8%
Housing and home modifications301301100.0%
Vocational services15811774.1%
Physical restoration1266350.0%
Other services12111595.0%
Peer counseling1189883.1%
Communication services835262.7%
Youth transition6134.9%
Transportation521936.5%
Assistive technology16637.5%
Personal assistance1515100.0%
Mobility training11327.3%
Children's services100.0%
Family services100.0%
All services2,3021,96285.2%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal categorySetAchievedIn progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment15011680
Communication442122
Mobility and transportation1626
Community-based living20720545
Educational2166
Vocational246109106
Self-care1538563
Information access and technology312
Personal resource management38912
Relocation from a nursing home or institution281221
Community and social participation24487106

Who the center served

Consumers by age
AgeConsumers
Under 516
5 to 19115
20 to 2471
25 to 59726
60 and older967
Age unavailable0
Consumers by disability type
DisabilityConsumers
Cognitive273
Mental or emotional57
Physical1,538
Hearing7
Vision19
Multiple disabilities1
Other0

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with Arizona residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 23 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
GroupConsumersShare of consumersShare of state disability populationRatio
White64334.3%59.4%0.58
Black or African American20811.1%3.5%3.17
American Indian or Alaska Native191.0%3.9%0.26
Asian1035.5%1.7%3.27
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander1025.4%0.1%41.43
Two or more races321.7%11.2%0.15
Hispanic or Latino (any race)76540.9%20.1%2.03

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

What this cannot tell you

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.