Southeast Alaska Independent Living, Inc.

What the center reported

726Consumers served428 carried over, 298 new
5,135Information and referral contacts
$4,506,912Total income
$21,592Part B
$416,853Part C
280Goals achievedof 1,000 set
4Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
8Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$21,592
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$416,853
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$67,273
Other federal funds	$21,217
State government funds	$1,074,043
Local government funds	$272,318
Private and other	$2,633,616
Total income	$4,506,912

Eight years of reports

Southeast Alaska Independent Living, Inc. by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C	Moved out of institutions
2016	1,167	$1,981,988	$23,095	$319,687	8
2017	1,302	$2,211,462	$33,747	$319,687	12
2018	1,295	$2,228,752	$11,251	$360,513	3
2019	1,102	$2,772,320	$12,720	$370,720	5
2020	758	$3,055,480	$13,738	$370,720	1
2021	690	$2,851,143	$5,643	$370,720	1
2022	627	$3,432,590	$73,413	$378,885	1
2023	726	$4,506,912	$21,592	$416,853	4

Consumers served, by year

20161,167
20171,302
20181,295
20191,102
2020758
2021690
2022627
2023726

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 4 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$6,208	20th	52th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$16,096	21th	43th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	28.0%	24th	24th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	58.6%	44th	52th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	0.55	40th	45th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	0.96	43th	33th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	100.0%	76th	78th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	86.0%	77th	88th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 6 of 7 members.
Staff with disabilities	60.0%	19th	35th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 14.7 of 24.4 FTE.
Equity index	21.1	53th	48th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	26.5%	33th	41th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	0	54th	54th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 11.2% of income; Part B varied by 82.9% (coefficient of variation) across the years reported.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (5,135) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
IL skills training	466	466	100.0%
Advocacy and legal services	202	202	100.0%
Vocational services	193	193	100.0%
Communication services	180	180	100.0%
Recreational services	148	148	100.0%
Housing and home modifications	106	106	100.0%
Preventive services	88	88	100.0%
Assistive technology	78	78	100.0%
Transportation	58	58	100.0%
Youth transition	42	42	100.0%
Personal assistance	40	40	100.0%
Peer counseling	37	37	100.0%
Other services	27	27	100.0%
Children's services	13	13	100.0%
Family services	9	9	100.0%
Counseling and related services	8	8	100.0%
Mental restoration	7	7	100.0%
Therapeutic treatment	6	6	100.0%
Physical restoration	4	4	100.0%
Prostheses and orthotics	1	1	100.0%
All services	1,713	1,713	100.0%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Advocacy and legal services: 202 of 202 requests filled (100.0%).
Assistive technology: 78 of 78 requests filled (100.0%).
Children's services: 13 of 13 requests filled (100.0%).
Communication services: 180 of 180 requests filled (100.0%).
Housing and home modifications: 106 of 106 requests filled (100.0%).
IL skills training: 466 of 466 requests filled (100.0%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	87	9	65
Communication	5	3	2
Mobility and transportation	22	12	5
Community-based living	70	18	36
Educational	13	6	5
Vocational	144	66	46
Self-care	153	35	96
Information access and technology	84	23	51
Personal resource management	261	57	143
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	9	4	4
Community and social participation	152	47	96

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	6
5 to 19	133
20 to 24	27
25 to 59	228
60 and older	332
Age unavailable	0

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	223
Mental or emotional	144
Physical	172
Hearing	21
Vision	60
Multiple disabilities	8
Other	98

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with Alaska residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 16 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	385	54.2%	59.2%	0.92
Black or African American	10	1.4%	2.5%	0.56
American Indian or Alaska Native	266	37.5%	16.3%	2.29
Asian	15	2.1%	4.6%	0.46
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	2	0.3%	1.5%	0.19
Two or more races	18	2.5%	10.2%	0.25
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	14	2.0%	5.7%	0.34

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

None of the arithmetic checks failed for this report. That means the tables add up, not that the counts are verified.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.