What the center reported

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
SourceAmount
Title VII Part B (through the state)$43,349
Title VII Part C (direct federal)$164,403
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)$0
Other federal funds$144,103
State government funds$395,730
Local government funds$0
Private and other$11,238
Total income$758,823

Eight years of reports

Handicap Awareness & Support League by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report yearConsumers servedTotal incomePart BPart CMoved out of institutions
2016308$434,407$84,065$126,0830
2017316$571,811$36,188$126,0830
2018304$647,499$19,650$142,18412
2019276$681,597$140,405$146,2090
2020181$703,741$136,686$146,2090
2021162$688,661$136,686$146,20915
2022148$648,049$43,349$149,4294
2023176$758,823$43,349$164,4031

Consumers served, by year

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 2 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
MeasureValueNational percentileSize-peer percentileWhat it is
Income per consumer$4,31133th23thTotal income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved$7,58840th39thTotal income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate50.8%49th58thGoals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met88.2%81th78thShare of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers0.5742th36thRelocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C0.6138th39thThe same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate51.1%3th3thConsumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities57.0%14th13thThe regulation requires more than 50%. 4 of 7 members.
Staff with disabilities80.0%54th47thShare of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 8.5 of 10.6 FTE.
Equity index9.589th96thIndex of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility14.5%71th66thCoefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags054th53thFailed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 27.4% of income; Part B varied by 59.8% (coefficient of variation) across the years reported.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (2,942) and is not in this table.
ServiceRequestedReceivedFill rate
Advocacy and legal services702840.0%
Peer counseling311341.9%
IL skills training302066.7%
Housing and home modifications16743.8%
Youth transition161487.5%
Counseling and related services151066.7%
Vocational services9444.4%
Communication services3133.3%
All services1909751.1%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal categorySetAchievedIn progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment1045544
Communication862
Mobility and transportation202
Community-based living17413
Educational281117
Vocational15104
Self-care220
Information access and technology963
Personal resource management422
Relocation from a nursing home or institution211
Community and social participation633

Who the center served

Consumers by age
AgeConsumers
Under 51
5 to 190
20 to 2416
25 to 5979
60 and older80
Age unavailable0
Consumers by disability type
DisabilityConsumers
Cognitive37
Mental or emotional31
Physical70
Hearing0
Vision5
Multiple disabilities22
Other11

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with Oregon residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 4 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
GroupConsumersShare of consumersShare of state disability populationRatio
White14785.5%77.0%1.11
Black or African American31.7%1.7%1.01
American Indian or Alaska Native42.3%1.4%1.69
Asian31.7%2.3%0.75
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander00.0%0.3%0.00
Two or more races84.7%8.6%0.54
Hispanic or Latino (any race)74.1%8.7%0.47

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

None of the arithmetic checks failed for this report. That means the tables add up, not that the counts are verified.

What this cannot tell you

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.