Utah Independent Living Center

What the center reported

2,107Consumers served746 carried over, 1,361 new
3,131Information and referral contacts
$1,404,140Total income
$58,025Part B
$565,148Part C
2,870Goals achievedof 4,243 set
15Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
8Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$58,025
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$565,148
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$0
Other federal funds	$0
State government funds	$738,297
Local government funds	$0
Private and other	$42,670
Total income	$1,404,140

Eight years of reports

Utah Independent Living Center by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C	Moved out of institutions
2016	2,241	$1,228,884	$71,479	$433,416	7
2017	2,079	$1,294,575	$71,479	$433,416	3
2018	2,022	$1,312,774	$81,207	$488,766	3
2019	1,900	$1,394,665	$88,034	$502,604	4
2020	2,433	$1,483,127	$88,025	$502,604	4
2021	2,119	$1,343,925	$88,024	$502,604	5
2022	2,317	$1,357,692	$65,670	$693,270	3
2023	2,107	$1,404,140	$58,025	$565,148	15

Consumers served, by year

20162,241
20172,079
20182,022
20191,900
20202,433
20212,119
20222,317
20232,107

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 3 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$666	98th	98th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$489	97th	95th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	67.6%	72th	66th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	91.6%	87th	84th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	0.71	47th	50th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	2.65	61th	60th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	95.2%	35th	33th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	60.0%	20th	25th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 3 of 5 members.
Staff with disabilities	67.0%	30th	34th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 8.0 of 12.0 FTE.
Equity index	7.1	95th	92th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	5.3%	99th	98th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	0	54th	56th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 44.4% of income; Part B varied by 14.1% (coefficient of variation) across the years reported.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (3,131) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
Assistive technology	941	924	98.2%
IL skills training	907	871	96.0%
Recreational services	890	863	97.0%
Peer counseling	841	828	98.5%
Youth transition	691	688	99.6%
Vocational services	505	503	99.6%
Advocacy and legal services	215	202	94.0%
Housing and home modifications	194	95	49.0%
Counseling and related services	147	132	89.8%
Transportation	114	99	86.8%
Communication services	103	100	97.1%
Mobility training	59	58	98.3%
Children's services	57	57	100.0%
Personal assistance	53	34	64.2%
Family services	33	25	75.8%
Physical restoration	24	23	95.8%
Rehabilitation technology	4	0	0.0%
Other services	3	3	100.0%
Prostheses and orthotics	1	1	100.0%
All services	5,782	5,506	95.2%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Housing and home modifications: 95 of 194 requests filled (49.0%).
Personal assistance: 34 of 53 requests filled (64.2%).
Family services: 25 of 33 requests filled (75.8%).
Transportation: 99 of 114 requests filled (86.8%).
Counseling and related services: 132 of 147 requests filled (89.8%).
Advocacy and legal services: 202 of 215 requests filled (94.0%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	556	495	54
Communication	120	101	19
Mobility and transportation	120	43	77
Community-based living	201	37	164
Educational	269	170	99
Vocational	510	398	112
Self-care	1,737	1,260	477
Information access and technology	56	42	14
Personal resource management	305	216	89
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	17	15	2
Community and social participation	347	91	283
Other	5	2	3

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	4
5 to 19	549
20 to 24	284
25 to 59	599
60 and older	671
Age unavailable	0

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	803
Mental or emotional	83
Physical	863
Hearing	22
Vision	11
Multiple disabilities	230
Other	95

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with Utah residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 78 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	1,548	76.3%	77.6%	0.98
Black or African American	49	2.4%	0.9%	2.74
American Indian or Alaska Native	20	1.0%	1.5%	0.67
Asian	36	1.8%	1.7%	1.06
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	29	1.4%	0.8%	1.72
Two or more races	23	1.1%	6.5%	0.17
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	324	16.0%	11.1%	1.44

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

None of the arithmetic checks failed for this report. That means the tables add up, not that the counts are verified.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.