New Horizons Disability Empowerment Center

What the center reported

295Consumers served77 carried over, 218 new
1,322Information and referral contacts
$2,708,799Total income
$72,013Part B
$295,715Part C
141Goals achievedof 269 set
8Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
8Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$72,013
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$295,715
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$0
Other federal funds	$7,500
State government funds	$365,826
Local government funds	$673,937
Private and other	$1,293,809
Total income	$2,708,799

Eight years of reports

New Horizons Disability Empowerment Center by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C	Moved out of institutions
2016	1,913	$1,160,495	$0	$217,284	2
2017	124	$1,441,416	$0	$218,549	1
2018	131	$1,732,379	$0	$249,161	6
2019	136	$1,466,610	$0	$257,916	1
2020	148	$1,951,930	$0	$257,916	0
2021	103	$2,079,270	$0	$263,230	9
2022	77	$2,324,778	$0	$274,268	1
2023	295	$2,708,799	$72,013	$295,715	8

Consumers served, by year

20161,913
2017124
2018131
2019136
2020148
2021103
202277
2023295

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 4 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$9,182	13th	39th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$19,211	18th	36th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	52.4%	52th	48th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	91.8%	87th	91th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	2.71	74th	76th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	2.71	62th	52th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	100.0%	76th	78th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	67.0%	37th	44th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 4 of 6 members.
Staff with disabilities	52.0%	6th	8th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 22.0 of 42.0 FTE.
Equity index	28.8	36th	28th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	25.7%	35th	42th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	0	54th	54th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 13.6% of income; Part B varied by 264.6% (coefficient of variation) across the years reported.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (1,322) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
Vocational services	94	94	100.0%
Housing and home modifications	87	87	100.0%
Transportation	64	64	100.0%
IL skills training	60	60	100.0%
Advocacy and legal services	56	56	100.0%
Peer counseling	49	49	100.0%
Physical restoration	43	43	100.0%
Youth transition	24	24	100.0%
Recreational services	21	21	100.0%
Preventive services	13	13	100.0%
Assistive technology	9	9	100.0%
Rehabilitation technology	6	6	100.0%
Other services	5	5	100.0%
All services	531	531	100.0%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Advocacy and legal services: 56 of 56 requests filled (100.0%).
Housing and home modifications: 87 of 87 requests filled (100.0%).
IL skills training: 60 of 60 requests filled (100.0%).
Peer counseling: 49 of 49 requests filled (100.0%).
Physical restoration: 43 of 43 requests filled (100.0%).
Preventive services: 13 of 13 requests filled (100.0%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	1	0	1
Mobility and transportation	64	63	1
Community-based living	4	1	3
Educational	54	0	54
Vocational	94	66	28
Self-care	3	2	1
Information access and technology	1	0	1
Personal resource management	2	0	2
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	10	8	2
Community and social participation	36	1	35

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	0
5 to 19	6
20 to 24	18
25 to 59	183
60 and older	82
Age unavailable	6

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	54
Mental or emotional	87
Physical	112
Hearing	6
Vision	9
Multiple disabilities	27
Other	0

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with Arizona residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 0 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	247	83.7%	59.4%	1.41
Black or African American	13	4.4%	3.5%	1.26
American Indian or Alaska Native	7	2.4%	3.9%	0.61
Asian	3	1.0%	1.7%	0.60
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	11	3.7%	0.1%	28.36
Two or more races	3	1.0%	11.2%	0.09
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	11	3.7%	20.1%	0.19

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

None of the arithmetic checks failed for this report. That means the tables add up, not that the counts are verified.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.