Greater New Haven Disability Rights Activists, Inc d/b/a Center for Disability Rights - CT

What the center reported

526Consumers served339 carried over, 187 new
760Information and referral contacts
$1,043,814Total income
$56,250Part B
$218,999Part C
423Goals achievedof 1,096 set
67Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
8Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$56,250
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$218,999
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$0
Other federal funds	$85,108
State government funds	$656,484
Local government funds	$0
Private and other	$26,973
Total income	$1,043,814

Eight years of reports

Greater New Haven Disability Rights Activists, Inc d/b/a Center for Disability Rights - CT by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C	Moved out of institutions
2016	167	$698,789	$34,416	$167,952	46
2017	160	$746,627	$2,018	$37,200	39
2018	167	$752,833	$37,200	$189,400	49
2019	234	$825,177	$37,200	$194,763	51
2020	386	$914,220	$42,992	$194,763	53
2021	447	$1,012,954	$44,100	$194,763	44
2022	504	$946,964	$45,000	$199,052	67
2023	526	$1,043,814	$56,250	$218,999	67

Consumers served, by year

2016167
2017160
2018167
2019234
2020386
2021447
2022504
2023526

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 2 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$1,984	70th	67th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$2,468	74th	71th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	38.6%	35th	39th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	51.6%	39th	38th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	12.74	93th	94th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	30.59	94th	96th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	98.4%	44th	45th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	89.0%	84th	87th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 8 of 9 members.
Staff with disabilities	90.0%	74th	70th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 9.5 of 10.5 FTE.
Equity index	22.8	49th	55th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	14.0%	73th	70th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	0	54th	53th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 26.4% of income; Part B varied by 39.6% (coefficient of variation) across the years reported.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (760) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
Housing and home modifications	91	91	100.0%
Peer counseling	91	91	100.0%
Advocacy and legal services	79	79	100.0%
Preventive services	62	62	100.0%
Youth transition	62	62	100.0%
IL skills training	57	57	100.0%
Personal assistance	46	39	84.8%
Recreational services	45	45	100.0%
Assistive technology	35	33	94.3%
Communication services	25	24	96.0%
Transportation	14	14	100.0%
Rehabilitation technology	2	2	100.0%
Vocational services	2	2	100.0%
Counseling and related services	1	1	100.0%
All services	612	602	98.4%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Personal assistance: 39 of 46 requests filled (84.8%).
Assistive technology: 33 of 35 requests filled (94.3%).
Communication services: 24 of 25 requests filled (96.0%).
Advocacy and legal services: 79 of 79 requests filled (100.0%).
Housing and home modifications: 91 of 91 requests filled (100.0%).
IL skills training: 57 of 57 requests filled (100.0%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	50	29	21
Communication	10	6	4
Mobility and transportation	21	10	11
Community-based living	192	69	123
Educational	7	2	5
Vocational	5	4	1
Self-care	157	64	93
Information access and technology	177	75	102
Personal resource management	241	83	158
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	219	67	152
Community and social participation	17	14	3

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	2
5 to 19	4
20 to 24	5
25 to 59	192
60 and older	323
Age unavailable	0

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	33
Mental or emotional	74
Physical	335
Hearing	59
Vision	16
Multiple disabilities	9
Other	0

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with Connecticut residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 19 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	294	58.0%	63.0%	0.92
Black or African American	165	32.5%	10.0%	3.25
American Indian or Alaska Native	2	0.4%	0.3%	1.34
Asian	2	0.4%	2.3%	0.17
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	1	0.2%	0.1%	3.40
Two or more races	0	0.0%	8.1%	0.00
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	43	8.5%	16.3%	0.52

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

None of the arithmetic checks failed for this report. That means the tables add up, not that the counts are verified.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.