Resources for Independent Living,Inc.

What the center reported

1,593Consumers served1,441 carried over, 152 new
5,442Information and referral contacts
$2,937,864Total income
$0Part B
$302,816Part C
3,268Goals achievedof 3,268 set
6Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
7Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$0
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$302,816
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$0
Other federal funds	$636,855
State government funds	$1,792,240
Local government funds	$115,217
Private and other	$90,735
Total income	$2,937,864

Eight years of reports

Resources for Independent Living,Inc. by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C	Moved out of institutions
2016	1,534	$1,001,344	$0	$231,973	0
2017	1,659	$1,202,413	$0	$231,973	0
2018	—	—	—	—	—
2019	1,655	$1,422,600	$0	$266,169	0
2020	1,687	$1,801,125	$0	$532,338	6
2021	1,501	$2,929,886	$0	$265,969	6
2022	1,535	$2,816,080	$0	$268,837	6
2023	1,593	$2,937,864	$0	$302,816	6

Consumers served, by year

20161,534
20171,659
2018—
20191,655
20201,687
20211,501
20221,535
20231,593

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 4 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$1,844	74th	92th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$899	92th	99th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	100.0%	100th	99th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	4.2%	8th	10th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	0.38	35th	38th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	1.98	56th	46th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	100.0%	76th	78th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	100.0%	93th	97th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 6 of 6 members.
Staff with disabilities	65.0%	27th	47th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 45.0 of 69.0 FTE.
Equity index	23.5	48th	42th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	39.4%	14th	18th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	1	5th	5th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 10.3% of income.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (5,442) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
Counseling and related services	1,205	1,205	100.0%
IL skills training	148	148	100.0%
Preventive services	134	134	100.0%
Vocational services	123	123	100.0%
Personal assistance	115	115	100.0%
Advocacy and legal services	112	112	100.0%
Youth transition	102	102	100.0%
Communication services	95	95	100.0%
Recreational services	92	92	100.0%
Peer counseling	80	80	100.0%
Housing and home modifications	78	78	100.0%
Other services	65	65	100.0%
Transportation	41	41	100.0%
Assistive technology	31	31	100.0%
Mobility training	21	21	100.0%
Physical restoration	19	19	100.0%
Therapeutic treatment	17	17	100.0%
Family services	11	11	100.0%
Prostheses and orthotics	11	11	100.0%
Rehabilitation technology	8	8	100.0%
Children's services	6	6	100.0%
Mental restoration	6	6	100.0%
All services	2,520	2,520	100.0%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Advocacy and legal services: 112 of 112 requests filled (100.0%).
Assistive technology: 31 of 31 requests filled (100.0%).
Communication services: 95 of 95 requests filled (100.0%).
Counseling and related services: 1,205 of 1,205 requests filled (100.0%).
Family services: 11 of 11 requests filled (100.0%).
Housing and home modifications: 78 of 78 requests filled (100.0%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	514	514
Communication	136	136
Mobility and transportation	205	205
Community-based living	570	570
Educational	213	213
Vocational	381	381
Self-care	277	277
Information access and technology	44	44
Personal resource management	152	152
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	6	6
Community and social participation	746	746
Other	24	24

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	0
5 to 19	61
20 to 24	139
25 to 59	854
60 and older	539
Age unavailable	0

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	600
Mental or emotional	240
Physical	344
Hearing	11
Vision	43
Multiple disabilities	341
Other	14

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with New Jersey residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 83 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	753	49.9%	55.4%	0.90
Black or African American	553	36.6%	13.3%	2.76
American Indian or Alaska Native	6	0.4%	0.4%	1.06
Asian	26	1.7%	5.0%	0.34
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	2	0.1%	0.0%	4.58
Two or more races	30	2.0%	8.3%	0.24
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	140	9.3%	17.6%	0.53

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

Goal achievement at or above 98%. With 20 or more goals set, nearly every goal was achieved, which can mean goals are recorded as set and achieved at the same time.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.