What the center reported

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
SourceAmount
Title VII Part B (through the state)$0
Title VII Part C (direct federal)$244,810
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)$0
Other federal funds$119,737
State government funds$582
Local government funds$0
Private and other$974
Total income$366,103

Eight years of reports

Southern Nevada Center for Independent Living by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report yearConsumers servedTotal incomePart BPart CMoved out of institutions
2016312$275,525$0$187,7470
2017289$250,860$0$175,8710
2018376$285,117$0$211,7231
2019449$286,825$0$217,7171
2020455$301,003$0$217,7174
2021432$341,355$0$217,7171
2022498$320,204$0$194,5810
2023474$366,103$0$244,8100

Consumers served, by year

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 1 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
MeasureValueNational percentileSize-peer percentileWhat it is
Income per consumer$77295th87thTotal income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved$4,46558th41thTotal income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate13.8%10th9thGoals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met32.6%24th24thShare of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers0.0011th14thRelocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C0.0011th14thThe same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate99.9%53th54thConsumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities60.0%20th13thThe regulation requires more than 50%. 3 of 5 members.
Staff with disabilities79.0%52th24thShare of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 3.4 of 4.3 FTE.
Equity index33.726th31thIndex of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility11.5%84th81thCoefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags054th53thFailed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 66.9% of income.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (862) and is not in this table.
ServiceRequestedReceivedFill rate
Advocacy and legal services141141100.0%
IL skills training141141100.0%
Peer counseling141141100.0%
Housing and home modifications9090100.0%
Children's services5252100.0%
Youth transition5252100.0%
Transportation2525100.0%
Preventive services1818100.0%
Vocational services99100.0%
Other services22100.0%
Communication services100.0%
Mental restoration11100.0%
Mobility training11100.0%
Personal assistance11100.0%
All services67567499.9%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal categorySetAchievedIn progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment1011289
Communication101
Mobility and transportation44935
Community-based living32824304
Educational23176
Vocational19019
Self-care36531
Information access and technology523
Personal resource management291316
Relocation from a nursing home or institution404
Community and social participation404

Who the center served

Consumers by age
AgeConsumers
Under 50
5 to 1926
20 to 2426
25 to 59263
60 and older159
Age unavailable0
Consumers by disability type
DisabilityConsumers
Cognitive76
Mental or emotional108
Physical243
Hearing5
Vision30
Multiple disabilities12
Other0

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with Nevada residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 4 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
GroupConsumersShare of consumersShare of state disability populationRatio
White15132.1%54.5%0.59
Black or African American19741.9%8.7%4.84
American Indian or Alaska Native51.1%1.2%0.86
Asian102.1%6.1%0.35
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander51.1%0.7%1.62
Two or more races357.4%10.4%0.71
Hispanic or Latino (any race)6714.3%18.4%0.78

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

None of the arithmetic checks failed for this report. That means the tables add up, not that the counts are verified.

What this cannot tell you

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.