What the center reported

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
SourceAmount
Title VII Part B (through the state)$89,013
Title VII Part C (direct federal)$284,168
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)$0
Other federal funds$0
State government funds$0
Local government funds$0
Private and other$4,870
Total income$378,051

Eight years of reports

Services Maximizing Independent Living and Empowerment by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report yearConsumers servedTotal incomePart BPart CMoved out of institutions
2016149$275,312$0$208,7992
2017205$278,442$50,417$210,0150
2018210$326,805$56,949$239,4310
2019235$315,472$53,901$247,8440
2020167$325,642$71,415$250,3080
2021274$326,748$70,000$252,9513
2022305$340,739$72,832$263,558589
2023412$378,051$89,013$284,16876

Consumers served, by year

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 1 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
MeasureValueNational percentileSize-peer percentileWhat it is
Income per consumer$91892th81thTotal income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved$81593th86thTotal income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate56.4%56th52thGoals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met98.3%97th97thShare of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers18.4597th96thRelocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C26.7493th96thThe same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate99.3%49th49thConsumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities86.0%77th66thThe regulation requires more than 50%. 6 of 7 members.
Staff with disabilities100.0%90th76thShare of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 10.0 of 10.0 FTE.
Equity index44.813th19thIndex of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility9.6%90th88thCoefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags054th53thFailed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 98.7% of income; Part B varied by 42.8% (coefficient of variation) across the years reported.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (1,551) and is not in this table.
ServiceRequestedReceivedFill rate
Advocacy and legal services331331100.0%
Youth transition192192100.0%
IL skills training107107100.0%
Transportation4141100.0%
Peer counseling1616100.0%
Assistive technology1212100.0%
Housing and home modifications7228.6%
All services70670199.3%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal categorySetAchievedIn progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment464264200
Mobility and transportation421823
Community-based living523
Vocational101
Self-care880
Information access and technology1274
Personal resource management220
Relocation from a nursing home or institution19276116
Community and social participation96878

Who the center served

Consumers by age
AgeConsumers
Under 53
5 to 1969
20 to 2433
25 to 59230
60 and older77
Age unavailable0
Consumers by disability type
DisabilityConsumers
Cognitive11
Mental or emotional124
Physical85
Hearing2
Vision22
Multiple disabilities168
Other0

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with Arizona residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 0 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
GroupConsumersShare of consumersShare of state disability populationRatio
White11227.2%59.4%0.46
Black or African American20.5%3.5%0.14
American Indian or Alaska Native61.5%3.9%0.37
Asian00.0%1.7%0.00
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander81.9%0.1%14.77
Two or more races245.8%11.2%0.52
Hispanic or Latino (any race)26063.1%20.1%3.13

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

None of the arithmetic checks failed for this report. That means the tables add up, not that the counts are verified.

What this cannot tell you

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.