OPTIONS for Independence

What the center reported

2,326Consumers served837 carried over, 1,489 new
6,429Information and referral contacts
$1,178,759Total income
$80,014Part B
$156,030Part C
3,052Goals achievedof 4,456 set
2Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
8Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$80,014
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$156,030
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$87,379
Other federal funds	$170,480
State government funds	$670,891
Local government funds	$0
Private and other	$13,965
Total income	$1,178,759

Eight years of reports

OPTIONS for Independence by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C	Moved out of institutions
2016	1,762	$753,596	$60,650	$119,661	1
2017	1,839	$754,578	$60,650	$119,661	1
2018	1,904	$754,474	$71,123	$134,942	2
2019	1,758	$852,465	$72,037	$138,762	1
2020	1,919	$1,020,454	$72,036	$138,762	3
2021	2,231	$1,030,488	$72,035	$138,762	1
2022	2,433	$1,131,023	$68,512	$141,818	0
2023	2,326	$1,178,759	$80,014	$156,030	2

Consumers served, by year

20161,762
20171,839
20181,904
20191,758
20201,919
20212,231
20222,433
20232,326

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 2 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$507	99th	99th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$386	98th	99th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	68.5%	74th	79th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	97.9%	96th	97th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	0.09	23th	22th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	1.28	49th	52th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	81.3%	15th	16th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	75.0%	57th	60th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 3 of 4 members.
Staff with disabilities	82.0%	59th	52th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 10.9 of 13.3 FTE.
Equity index	15.4	71th	79th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	17.7%	59th	55th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	0	54th	53th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 27.4% of income; Part B varied by 8.6% (coefficient of variation) across the years reported.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (6,429) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
Preventive services	2,067	1,568	75.9%
Assistive technology	2,066	1,549	75.0%
IL skills training	229	221	96.5%
Peer counseling	227	225	99.1%
Communication services	161	160	99.4%
Advocacy and legal services	155	151	97.4%
Youth transition	149	133	89.3%
Recreational services	142	141	99.3%
Transportation	133	132	99.2%
Mobility training	105	100	95.2%
Counseling and related services	86	85	98.8%
Children's services	45	40	88.9%
Family services	34	34	100.0%
Housing and home modifications	33	32	97.0%
Mental restoration	19	18	94.7%
Physical restoration	17	17	100.0%
Vocational services	8	7	87.5%
Rehabilitation technology	3	3	100.0%
Personal assistance	2	2	100.0%
Prostheses and orthotics	1	1	100.0%
Other services	1	1	100.0%
All services	5,683	4,620	81.3%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Assistive technology: 1,549 of 2,066 requests filled (75.0%).
Preventive services: 1,568 of 2,067 requests filled (75.9%).
Children's services: 40 of 45 requests filled (88.9%).
Youth transition: 133 of 149 requests filled (89.3%).
Mental restoration: 18 of 19 requests filled (94.7%).
Mobility training: 100 of 105 requests filled (95.2%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	71	31	40
Communication	36	16	20
Mobility and transportation	697	455	242
Community-based living	139	70	69
Educational	22	10	12
Vocational	17	5	12
Self-care	1,121	792	329
Information access and technology	2,096	1,584	512
Personal resource management	80	26	54
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	5	2	3
Community and social participation	169	58	111
Other	3	3	0

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	10
5 to 19	140
20 to 24	75
25 to 59	648
60 and older	1,453
Age unavailable	0

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	38
Mental or emotional	42
Physical	2,039
Hearing	3
Vision	39
Multiple disabilities	156
Other	9

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with Utah residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 4 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	2,160	93.0%	77.6%	1.20
Black or African American	9	0.4%	0.9%	0.44
American Indian or Alaska Native	6	0.3%	1.5%	0.18
Asian	9	0.4%	1.7%	0.23
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	5	0.2%	0.8%	0.26
Two or more races	2	0.1%	6.5%	0.01
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	131	5.6%	11.1%	0.51

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

None of the arithmetic checks failed for this report. That means the tables add up, not that the counts are verified.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.