CAMDEN CITY INDEPENDENT LIVING CENTER, INC.

What the center reported

449Consumers served229 carried over, 220 new
1,511Information and referral contacts
$228,359Total income
$0Part B
$228,259Part C
630Goals achievedof 1,192 set
0Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
8Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$0
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$228,259
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$0
Other federal funds	$0
State government funds	$0
Local government funds	$0
Private and other	$100
Total income	$228,359

Eight years of reports

CAMDEN CITY INDEPENDENT LIVING CENTER, INC. by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C	Moved out of institutions
2016	510	$174,858	$0	$174,858	14
2017	499	$173,773	$0	$173,773	41
2018	548	$196,074	$0	$194,874	9
2019	587	$200,636	$0	$200,636	0
2020	540	$200,636	$0	$200,636	0
2021	409	$200,279	$0	$200,279	0
2022	415	$193,996	$0	$193,996	1
2023	449	$228,359	$0	$228,259	0

Consumers served, by year

2016510
2017499
2018548
2019587
2020540
2021409
2022415
2023449

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 1 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$509	99th	97th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$362	98th	96th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	52.9%	52th	48th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	62.5%	47th	42th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	0.00	11th	14th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	0.00	11th	14th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	100.0%	76th	77th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	88.0%	81th	73th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 7 of 8 members.
Staff with disabilities	71.0%	38th	10th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 5.0 of 7.0 FTE.
Equity index	60.1	5th	11th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	8.2%	94th	92th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	0	54th	53th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 100.0% of income.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (1,511) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
IL skills training	1,019	1,019	100.0%
Children's services	431	431	100.0%
Housing and home modifications	252	252	100.0%
Recreational services	204	204	100.0%
Vocational services	162	162	100.0%
Preventive services	115	115	100.0%
Advocacy and legal services	99	99	100.0%
Youth transition	38	38	100.0%
Transportation	34	34	100.0%
Personal assistance	24	24	100.0%
Assistive technology	16	16	100.0%
Communication services	16	16	100.0%
Therapeutic treatment	10	10	100.0%
Family services	9	9	100.0%
Counseling and related services	7	7	100.0%
Peer counseling	7	7	100.0%
Mobility training	5	5	100.0%
Rehabilitation technology	5	5	100.0%
Physical restoration	3	3	100.0%
Prostheses and orthotics	3	3	100.0%
All services	2,459	2,459	100.0%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Advocacy and legal services: 99 of 99 requests filled (100.0%).
Assistive technology: 16 of 16 requests filled (100.0%).
Children's services: 431 of 431 requests filled (100.0%).
Communication services: 16 of 16 requests filled (100.0%).
Housing and home modifications: 252 of 252 requests filled (100.0%).
IL skills training: 1,019 of 1,019 requests filled (100.0%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	24	14	10
Communication	18	13	5
Mobility and transportation	16	11	5
Community-based living	198	49	149
Educational	91	58	33
Vocational	23	22	1
Self-care	609	338	223
Information access and technology	33	31	2
Personal resource management	38	21	17
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	2	0	2
Community and social participation	140	73	50

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	25
5 to 19	58
20 to 24	37
25 to 59	191
60 and older	138
Age unavailable	0

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	136
Mental or emotional	98
Physical	136
Hearing	27
Vision	15
Multiple disabilities	37
Other	0

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with New Jersey residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 0 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	35	7.8%	55.4%	0.14
Black or African American	286	63.7%	13.3%	4.80
American Indian or Alaska Native	10	2.2%	0.4%	5.95
Asian	4	0.9%	5.0%	0.18
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	0	0.0%	0.0%	0.00
Two or more races	0	0.0%	8.3%	0.00
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	114	25.4%	17.6%	1.44

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

None of the arithmetic checks failed for this report. That means the tables add up, not that the counts are verified.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.