Red Rock Center for Independence

What the center reported

964Consumers served699 carried over, 265 new
1,486Information and referral contacts
$1,094,665Total income
$82,340Part B
$164,187Part C
759Goals achievedof 1,475 set
2Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
8Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$82,340
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$164,187
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$86,515
Other federal funds	$0
State government funds	$727,239
Local government funds	$5,441
Private and other	$28,943
Total income	$1,094,665

Eight years of reports

Red Rock Center for Independence by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C	Moved out of institutions
2016	939	$899,298	$63,113	$129,916	10
2017	1,060	$861,974	$51,609	$125,916	15
2018	1,122	$932,046	$73,823	$141,996	6
2019	1,058	$952,622	$77,647	$146,016	2
2020	965	$1,128,460	$0	$146,016	4
2021	1,032	$1,111,500	$83,810	$146,016	6
2022	990	$998,117	$76,890	$149,232	2
2023	964	$1,094,665	$82,340	$164,187	2

Consumers served, by year

2016939
20171,060
20181,122
20191,058
2020965
20211,032
2022990
2023964

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 2 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$1,136	87th	90th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$1,442	86th	90th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	51.5%	51th	59th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	94.8%	92th	91th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	0.21	29th	26th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	1.22	48th	50th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	71.5%	11th	13th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	88.0%	81th	83th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 7 of 8 members.
Staff with disabilities	61.0%	21th	19th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 11.0 of 18.0 FTE.
Equity index	12.9	78th	86th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	9.6%	90th	89th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	0	54th	53th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 30.4% of income; Part B varied by 40.9% (coefficient of variation) across the years reported.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (1,486) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
Counseling and related services	777	561	72.2%
Assistive technology	579	350	60.4%
IL skills training	422	378	89.6%
Recreational services	292	244	83.6%
Advocacy and legal services	276	156	56.5%
Transportation	240	186	77.5%
Peer counseling	211	160	75.8%
Youth transition	154	129	83.8%
Family services	147	79	53.7%
Vocational services	108	94	87.0%
Preventive services	73	35	47.9%
Mobility training	64	32	50.0%
Children's services	56	46	82.1%
Physical restoration	56	40	71.4%
Personal assistance	53	31	58.5%
Housing and home modifications	44	32	72.7%
Communication services	32	16	50.0%
Prostheses and orthotics	19	13	68.4%
Rehabilitation technology	14	6	42.9%
Other services	2	2	100.0%
Mental restoration	1	0	0.0%
All services	3,620	2,590	71.5%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Rehabilitation technology: 6 of 14 requests filled (42.9%).
Preventive services: 35 of 73 requests filled (47.9%).
Communication services: 16 of 32 requests filled (50.0%).
Mobility training: 32 of 64 requests filled (50.0%).
Family services: 79 of 147 requests filled (53.7%).
Advocacy and legal services: 156 of 276 requests filled (56.5%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	295	123	172
Communication	92	43	49
Mobility and transportation	224	111	112
Community-based living	56	28	28
Educational	29	14	15
Vocational	85	56	29
Self-care	79	38	41
Information access and technology	261	126	133
Personal resource management	22	3	19
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	5	2	3
Community and social participation	327	215	112

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	1
5 to 19	173
20 to 24	51
25 to 59	230
60 and older	509
Age unavailable	0

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	85
Mental or emotional	168
Physical	281
Hearing	44
Vision	209
Multiple disabilities	177
Other	0

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with Utah residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 5 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	861	89.8%	77.6%	1.16
Black or African American	10	1.0%	0.9%	1.18
American Indian or Alaska Native	19	2.0%	1.5%	1.34
Asian	3	0.3%	1.7%	0.19
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	2	0.2%	0.8%	0.25
Two or more races	8	0.8%	6.5%	0.13
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	56	5.8%	11.1%	0.53

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

None of the arithmetic checks failed for this report. That means the tables add up, not that the counts are verified.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.