New Mexico
4 centers reported for report year 2023, serving 2,290 consumers.
Report year 2023 at a glance
- 4Centers reporting
- 2,290Consumers served
- 2,708Information and referral contacts
- $17,304,185Total center income
- $287,703Part B reported by centersstate-administered IL funds that reached centers
- $1,094,997Part Cdirect federal center funding
- 9Moved out of institutions
- 346,122People with a disability16.7% of 2,077,871 civilian noninstitutionalized residents
- 66.2Reach per 10,000percentile 73 of 53
- $50Center income per person with a disability
Eight years of reports
| Report year | Centers | Consumers served | Total income | Part B | Part C | Moved out of institutions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 4 | 1,747 | $11,500,788 | $277,542 | $838,923 | 5 |
| 2017 | 4 | 1,512 | $11,212,502 | $280,537 | $839,761 | 7 |
| 2018 | 4 | 1,616 | $11,410,835 | $270,999 | $947,003 | 4 |
| 2019 | 4 | 1,474 | $19,962,907 | $592,514 | $973,814 | 6 |
| 2020 | 4 | 1,877 | $21,037,409 | $592,514 | $973,814 | 11 |
| 2021 | 4 | 2,313 | $14,811,887 | $285,564 | $973,814 | 8 |
| 2022 | 4 | 2,225 | $14,110,723 | $347,190 | $995,262 | 8 |
| 2023 | 4 | 2,290 | $17,304,186 | $287,703 | $1,094,997 | 9 |
Consumers served, by year
Centers
| Center | Grant | Consumers | Income | Part B | Part C | Service fill rate | Goal rate | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Independent Living Resource Center (grant 2301NMILCL) | 2301NMILCL | 326 | $12,422,845 | $287,703 | $86,524 | 100.0% | 33.9% | 0 |
| Independent Living Resource Center (grant 2302NMILCL) | 2302NMILCL | 147 | $280,556 | $0 | $87,197 | 100.0% | 39.7% | 0 |
| New Vistas | 2303NMILCL | 603 | $2,896,376 | $0 | $514,051 | 97.8% | 22.8% | 0 |
| The Ability Center | 2304NMILCL | 1,214 | $1,704,408 | $0 | $407,225 | 100.0% | 100.0% | 1 |
Counties
The public Program Performance Report has no county detail, so the two right-hand columns are blank. A state can fill them from its own contract reports or by asking each center for its county table (PPR item 3.8), and then compute county reach the same way as the state figure above.
| County | Population | With a disability | Disability rate | Under 18 | 18 to 64 | 65 and over | Consumers served | Reach |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bernalillo County | 666,395 | 103,996 | 15.6% | 6,504 | 55,458 | 42,034 | — | — |
| Catron County | 3,679 | 1,461 | 39.7% | 9 | 520 | 932 | — | — |
| Chaves County | 63,156 | 12,256 | 19.4% | 1,256 | 6,859 | 4,141 | — | — |
| Cibola County | 25,551 | 5,411 | 21.2% | 325 | 2,945 | 2,141 | — | — |
| Colfax County | 11,706 | 3,071 | 26.2% | 156 | 1,305 | 1,610 | — | — |
| Curry County | 43,752 | 8,120 | 18.6% | 553 | 4,687 | 2,880 | — | — |
| De Baca County | 1,566 | 308 | 19.7% | 0 | 115 | 193 | — | — |
| Doña Ana County | 218,466 | 30,716 | 14.1% | 2,953 | 15,798 | 11,965 | — | — |
| Eddy County | 60,479 | 9,742 | 16.1% | 1,205 | 4,854 | 3,683 | — | — |
| Grant County | 27,363 | 6,250 | 22.8% | 275 | 2,458 | 3,517 | — | — |
| Guadalupe County | 3,925 | 880 | 22.4% | 28 | 398 | 454 | — | — |
| Harding County | 746 | 153 | 20.5% | 3 | 42 | 108 | — | — |
| Hidalgo County | 4,015 | 708 | 17.6% | 24 | 374 | 310 | — | — |
| Lea County | 71,479 | 8,973 | 12.6% | 905 | 4,618 | 3,450 | — | — |
| Lincoln County | 20,074 | 4,568 | 22.8% | 208 | 1,996 | 2,364 | — | — |
| Los Alamos County | 19,220 | 1,995 | 10.4% | 92 | 914 | 989 | — | — |
| Luna County | 25,039 | 5,393 | 21.5% | 579 | 2,137 | 2,677 | — | — |
| McKinley County | 70,605 | 11,259 | 15.9% | 568 | 5,936 | 4,755 | — | — |
| Mora County | 4,176 | 1,198 | 28.7% | 68 | 559 | 571 | — | — |
| Otero County | 61,755 | 12,480 | 20.2% | 745 | 6,685 | 5,050 | — | — |
| Quay County | 8,545 | 2,252 | 26.4% | 84 | 1,202 | 966 | — | — |
| Rio Arriba County | 40,082 | 5,974 | 14.9% | 462 | 2,834 | 2,678 | — | — |
| Roosevelt County | 18,596 | 3,649 | 19.6% | 484 | 1,864 | 1,301 | — | — |
| San Juan County | 120,020 | 18,800 | 15.7% | 1,136 | 8,907 | 8,757 | — | — |
| San Miguel County | 26,633 | 6,531 | 24.5% | 244 | 3,454 | 2,833 | — | — |
| Sandoval County | 150,847 | 22,782 | 15.1% | 1,377 | 11,363 | 10,042 | — | — |
| Santa Fe County | 153,738 | 22,820 | 14.8% | 1,741 | 9,745 | 11,334 | — | — |
| Sierra County | 11,270 | 3,253 | 28.9% | 122 | 1,296 | 1,835 | — | — |
| Socorro County | 16,070 | 4,144 | 25.8% | 448 | 1,787 | 1,909 | — | — |
| Taos County | 34,307 | 6,317 | 18.4% | 252 | 2,402 | 3,663 | — | — |
| Torrance County | 15,259 | 3,823 | 25.1% | 268 | 1,945 | 1,610 | — | — |
| Union County | 3,613 | 842 | 23.3% | 53 | 426 | 363 | — | — |
| Valencia County | 75,744 | 15,997 | 21.1% | 1,004 | 8,628 | 6,365 | — | — |
Using this for your State Plan
Most State Plans for Independent Living define served and unserved areas by whether a center's service area covers a county. That cannot see under-reach inside a covered area. A penetration-rate measure can: consumers served in a county, divided by the county's civilian noninstitutionalized population with a disability.
- Get consumers served by county from each center, for the same twelve months, on the same definition of "consumer".
- Divide by the county disability population in the table above.
- Set the target as a position among peers, for example reaching the national median of 44.9 per 10,000, rather than a fixed share that no state has met.
Draft indicator language for New Mexico, with these numbers filled in.
How every measure on this page is built, including what it cannot tell you.